
The man who brought Peking Opera (Beijing Opera) to New York in 1937.
I am always enthralled by someone who lived through the ages, through major historic or cultural events. For instance, Mei Lan Fang, an opera artist- who lived through modernization, brought the first ever Peking Opera performance to New York, lived through second world war and was born in 1894, pigtail era! That is like one hell of an exciting lifetime.
(If you survive that is)
Okay, what did I observe from the movie?
Firstly, revolution, resolution to stick to your guns in times of cultural upheaval.
Mei Lan Fang challenged his mentor in artistic terms. In the past, his acts were limited to silent performance, sitting at a corner and was like a prop character. When he ventured to a slight tilt of his head or by showing his profile,, the crowd went wildly crazy for him. He then challenged his mentor who agreed to have simultaneous performances where the performer with the most sold-out performances is winner. Defeat was too much to bear for the old mentor and he took his own life. Still, he encouraged the young performer to venture. 输,不可怕,怕才可怕。 There is no fear in loosing, there is only fear in fearing.
Secondly, I don't think I can understand the degree of sticking your ego to your passion.
The Japanese general commanded Mei Lan Fang to perform for them, either that or die.
Mei Lan Fang chose to die. He said no one would later on watch a "tinted" Mei Lan Fang should he perform for the enemy. This sentiment is the same with many war heros. But don't they think they should safe their lives so that they live on to contribute? I think we modern people may never know that degree of dignity they have.
Lastly, 悲美
Why do I say this?
Mei Lan Fang was a lonely boy, a lonely teen, a lonely adult. His suppossedly unique and supreme skills were by-products of his loneliness, melancholy, or some form of pining, longing for something missing. When he found his true love, he was all delighted, wanted to go on dates, was a happy man. But his "support system"- the people around him, his wife, his managers, business partners,
All thought that it was disastrous. They forced them to seperate. A happy man will not be a good artist they deemed. They think that love will destroy him. And so the lover left him and his life was sacrificed for his art
per se. Does it have to be 悲 to be 美? Why is this theme so common across artists of all era and cultures? Does it mean that the general public unconsciously enjoy being sad or see sadness as a form of beauty?